Why the Ram Setu or Adam's bridge must not be destroyed
[author:tarun vijay Public time:Oct 5, 2007] |
|
Sethusamudram, a project to create alternative shorter route for ships to cross the Gulf of Mannar, between India and Sri Lanka, is more than 150 years old. In 1955, the Government of India set up the Sethusamudram project committee to look into the feasibility of the project and five routes were discussed till 2001.
The official web site of the project says, 'Ships originating from the west of India and destined for Chennai, Ennore, Vishakapatnam, Paradeep, Haldia and Kolkata have to travel around the Sri Lankan coast resulting in increase of travel distance and time. The total cost of the project is Rs 2,427 crores (Rs 24.27 billion) and involves destruction of a bridge believed to have been built by Lord Rama and Muslims and Christians believe it to be Adam's creation.
Lack of proper consultation has stirred up protests from the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh, the Vishwa Hindu Parishad, the Bharatiya Janata Party and the Hindu Dharma Acharya Sabha. Ashok Singhal of the VHP is spearheading a movement to protect the Ram Setu. He addressed a big public meeting in Rameshwaram with religious heads and Dr Subramanian Swamy. BJP leader and former Union human resources development minister Dr Murli Manohar Joshi has written to the prime minister, urging him to stop the destruction of the great heritage site.
The Encyclopedia Britannica describes the bridge thus, 'Adam's Bridge also called Rama's Bridge, chain of shoals, between the islands of Mannar, near northwestern Sri Lanka, and Rameswaram, off the southeastern coast of India.'
Apart from such issues of heritage and belief, there are genuine concerns regarding security and the tsunamis' impact increasing in case the Ram Setu is destroyed.
The role of the Tuticorin Port Trust, the nodal agency to implement the Sethu Samudram Canal Project coupled with the haste with which the project was inaugurated, has given rise to many unanswered questions. The US Navy operational directive refusing to accept the sea between India and Sri Lanka as 'historic' was made on June 23, 2005.
Local fishermen, Hindus, Muslims and Christians alike oppose the present route and are demanding alternative channels, which are available. They say the present channel would destroy marine life and corals. This will kill the trade in shankas (shells) that has a turnover in excess of Rs 150 crore (Rs 1.5 billion) per annum. Invaluable thorium deposits would be affected, which are too important for our nuclear fuel requirements.
The issue concerns us all, and should be taken up as Indians, without getting entangled in party lines and political games. The Ram Setu or Adam's Bridge belongs to all humanity, being an important heritage site.
Otherinfo:Editor,
Panchjanya, Hindi Weekly
Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh
Delhi
India
Printed From:http://www.free-press-release.com/news/200710/1191570089.html
Source:Free Press Release
Similar news >>
Anxiety And Panic Attacks － Cure Panic Attacks Instantly With The Panic Away Me [Jun 14, 2007]
Free movies download [Dec 14, 2006]
Ex Soldier Joins Forces with IT Consultant, to Make the World a Happier Place. [Oct 19, 2005]
Bird Flu Prevention The Natural Healthy Way FREE Report http://birdflu.50webs.com [Oct 11, 2005]
Why can't the content in DVD be duplicated in the usual ways? [Jul 20, 2005]
|
|
