Bush Leaks vs. Clinton/Democrat leaks
[author:Fred Martinez Public time:Apr 17, 2006] |
|
Bush Leaks vs. Clinton/Democrat leaks
The Democrat/media hypocrisy on the Bush leaks is almost laughable.
According to a November 2, 2000 AP article Nancy Pelosi joined the nation's largest news organizations in opposing and getting Bill Clinton to veto a bill that “would criminalize all unauthorized disclosures of classified information.” Why do Pelosi and the media now want to criminalize leaks? Why didn't they want to do the same then?
The AP article “News organizations ask Clinton to veto classified leaks bill” wrote Pelosi opposed the bill because she worried that “even members of Congress could face felony charges for revealing classified information.”
Pelosi and the media want us now to believe that they are not hypocrites for being “scandalized” by the Bush leaks. I might believe the Democrats and the media are not hypocrites if they had been scandalized when:
- “Linda Tripp, whose Pentagon personnel file was illegally leaked in 1998 by a Clinton Defense Department flak to New Yorker Magazine writer Jane Mayer, who promptly splashed details of Tripp's shoplifting arrest as a teenager across its pages.”
- “Paula Jones, whose tax returns were illegally leaked in Sept. 1997 to New York Daily News columnist Lar Erik Nelson”
-“And where were our self-appointed guardians of privacy when the White House decided that the best way to discredit Clinton sexual assault accuser Kathleen Willey was to release her personal correspondence to the press."["U.S. District Court Judge Royce Lamberth later ruled that the shabby manuever was a criminal violation of the Privacy Act. Democrats."]
-“And what about the mother of all White House privacy violations, Filegate. Over 1100 FBI files on Republicans were dispatched into the custody of bar bouncer-turned-White House security chief Craig Livingstone.”
-"’Sen. Patrick Leahy, D-Vt., vice chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee, inadvertently disclosed a top secret communications intercept during a [1985] television interview,’ reported the San Diego Union-Tribune in a 1987 editorial criticizing Congress' penchant for partisan leaks."["‘The intercept, apparently of Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak's telephone conversations, made possible the capture of the Arab terrorists who had hijacked the cruise ship Achille Lauro and murdered American citizens,' the paper said, adding, 'The reports cost the life of at least one Egyptian operative involved in the operation.’"]
[http://72.14.203.104/search?q=cache:Pcgg4MyjjxEJ:www.newsmax.com/archives/ic/2003/9/30/133115.shtml+clintons+illegal+leaks+&hl=en&gl=us&ct=clnk&cd=1&ie=UTF-8]
Otherinfo:To order Fred Martinez's book by check or money order click:
http://hiddenaxisofevil.blogspot.com/2005/05/free-book-offer.html
Printed From:http://www.free-press-release.com/news/200604/1145331765.html
Source:Free Press Release
Similar news >>
Imperato for President Recognizes Bush/Afghan for Finally Pointing out the Poppy [Feb 16, 2007]
Forget your password? [Nov 17, 2006]
Reduce Operational Costs by Eliminating Printer Management to Print Any Oracle Apps Reports to Any P [Aug 22, 2006]
Franchising for the Family [Jun 16, 2006]
Bush Leaks vs. Clinton/Democrat leaks [Apr 17, 2006]
Bush’s Leaks vs. the Clinton/Democrat leaks [Apr 14, 2006]
Business Computing Magazine announces the Best 50 Business Products of 2005 Awards [Dec 8, 2005]
Business Lawyer 2003 Deluxe - Over 130 contracts, forms, letters, checklists and more [Apr 24, 2005]
Business and Family Lawyer - simple-to-use resource that puts you in control [Apr 20, 2005]
Business and Family Lawyer: Business and Family Lawyer download [Feb 25, 2005]
|
|
